Smith Pursuing every oversight avenue
@KKX Never charged by Kings Cross PAC
NSW Police Every complaint closed — no independent review

Every oversight body I have contacted, in chronological order, and what happened. The pattern is consistent: each body closed the matter without engaging the documentary record.

Every Avenue, Every Outcome

2022
First Reports to Crime Stoppers and Police — From January 2021 I reported impersonation and identity theft to NSW Police (Kings Cross PAC). Crime Stoppers reports: 996961 999823 1002693 1012217 1015185. CIRS reports: CIRS-20241002-79 CIRS-20241121-242. The person I reported has never been charged by that command.
September 2024
Inspector Winch Declines to Investigate — On 20 September 2024, Inspector Martha Winch (Professional Standards Duty Officer, Kings Cross PAC) wrote: "The complaint does not amount to misconduct and will be declined to be investigated." This was released via GIPAA-2025-0943218. Between September 2024 and February 2025, Winch directed me five times in writing to raise my concerns at court or with my solicitor. The internal rationale for this direction was withheld under s.14(1)(e).
October 2024
Customer Assistance Unit — I sought email contact with a Domestic Violence Liaison Officer due to my disability (I cannot communicate effectively verbally). The Customer Assistance Unit (CAS-2183884-M3H4) told me to attend a police station or call 131 444. They did not provide email contact. Inspector Winch then warned that continuing complaints without "significant new and cogent information" may result in restrictions on my contact.
February 2025
Communication Ban — On 16 February 2025, Inspector Winch banned me from contacting any staff or officer at Kings Cross Police. On 21 February 2025, Commander El-Badawi (D/2025/201535) confirmed: "We will not be addressing any further correspondence from you on this matter." GIPA searches later confirmed no authorisation record for this ban exists — it is enforced but undocumented.
June 2025
The Welfare Check — Fifteen days after Prosecution 3 was dismissed on 10 June 2025, an officer calling himself "Brendan" (extension 40027, Kings Cross Proactive Crime Team) contacted Queensland Health to request a welfare assessment of me. The stated reason the next day: I had "made further complaints to a Federal Ministers Office." Released records under GIPA REV-2025-0858528 do not record the Triple Zero call said to have prompted the referral. They record no related COPS event or CAD result in the searched material. The InfoLink officer called the pathway "very unusual."
June 2023
Sydney City PAC — Two Complaints Declined — Superintendent Martin Fileman issued two outcome letters on the same day, 2 June 2023. EXT2023-1685: complaint about an officer being unprofessional during a phone call on 25 April 2023 — declined under s132(a), Police Act 1990. The Duty Officer "spoke to the subject officer" about manner. EXT2023-1827: complaint about officers failing to investigate the incident — declined under s132(b). "No misconduct or maladministration is seen in the actions of the involved officers."
📄

Fileman Outcome Letters — EXT2023-1685 & EXT2023-1827

Two Professional Standards complaint outcomes, both dated 2 June 2023, both declined. Signed by Supt Martin Fileman, Commander, Sydney City PAC.

April 2022 — April 2026
LECC Complaints — Seven Cases, All Closed — I filed complaints with the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission over four years. Seven files were opened. Every one was closed — either "satisfied with police handling," referred back to police, or assessed as below the serious misconduct threshold. No independent investigation was conducted at any stage.
CASE20222615 · 15 April 2022
First LECC complaint. Assessed and referred to NSW Police. LECC declined to investigate.
CASE20235274 · 11 August 2023
LECC "satisfied with how police have dealt with your complaint." Referred to prior police refs EXT2022-2316 & EXT2023-1827. Signed by Acting Team Leader Shraddha Patel.
CASE20237645 · 8 November 2023
Referred to NSW Police Force for their action. LECC did not investigate.
CASE20248756/CD · 29 October 2024
LECC assessed complaint as "does not have enough information to determine misconduct." Kept for information only. No further action.
CASE202411928/LS · 28 February 2025
LECC "satisfied with how police have dealt with your complaint." Identified that the same concerns had been directed to the Commission on three prior occasions (CASE20222615, CASE20235274, CASE20237645). No further action.
CASE202512717/5LS · 2 December 2025
Complaint about Constable Hammer's investigation and Supt Dunstan's review. LECC "satisfied with the handling of your complaint" by police (EXT2025-6654). No further action.
CASE20265651 · 24 April 2026
Tom Mellor's complaint to the LECC. Assessed as not meeting the serious misconduct threshold. Proposed s43 referral to police for information — required Mellor's consent by 1 May 2026. Not treated as a formal complaint under Part 8A.
November 2025
Dunstan Outcome Letter & Smith's Review — On 11 November 2025, Superintendent Dunstan (Sydney City PAC) issued an outcome letter (EXT2025-6654) concluding the investigation was "conducted in a thorough manner" and "the available evidence supports the allegations and subsequent charge." Three days later, I replied demanding clarification: the officer name, the charge number, and the complaint reference — noting the court record shows the charge was DISMISSED NOT GUILTY. The outcome letter assessed an investigation into a prosecution that collapsed at hearing.
📄

Smith's Review of Dunstan Outcome

Email dated 14 November 2025 demanding specific identification: officer name, charge number (H number), and complaint reference. Notes the outcome letter refers only to "your correspondence" but omits all defining identifiers.

October 2025
Ministerial Response (F/2025/55291) — The Minister for Police responded to Alex Greenwich MP's office. The response advised that my allegations had been "fully investigated" and that I should contact Kings Cross PAC. The briefing notes were authored by DCI Gretchen Atkins of Kings Cross PAC — the command my complaint concerns. The contact advice was operationally false: I was banned from contacting that command.
January–February 2026
Further Ministerial Correspondence — I wrote to the Minister on 23 January 2026, titled "Evidence of False Information Provided to Executive Government." The response from B. Mumberson (19 February 2026) rephrased my complaint about false information as a complaint about "insufficient evidence to substantiate claims of identity theft." A letter about police providing false information to government was answered with further false information from the same source.
📄

NSW Police Response

Ministerial response recharacterising the complaint, 19 February 2026.

March 2026
Inspector Plummer Exchange — On 15 March 2026, I spoke by telephone with Inspector Plummer of Kings Cross PAC. During that exchange, Inspector Plummer advised me to stop submitting evidence relating to the matter. This forms a twelfth ground in my LECC complaint.
📄

GIPAA-2025-0909690 and REV-2025-0947041 — Prosecution 3 Decision Records

Original GIPA decision (GIPAA-2025-0909690, 20 November 2025) and internal review (REV-2025-0947041, 2 December 2025) releasing the Prosecution 3 charging decision records. Both complete public-redacted copies.

March 2026
Letter to Queensland Premier — On 9 March 2026, I wrote to Premier David Crisafulli MP demanding a state-level response to the cross-border welfare check. The letter was titled "Queensland Sovereignty and Resident Safety." The core allegation: a sworn officer of another state initiated a mental health emergency response on the strength of a Triple Zero call that the released GIPA records do not record — deploying Queensland's emergency resources against a Queensland resident who had complained to a Federal Minister's office.
📄

Letter to Premier Crisafulli

Demanding a state-level response to the cross-border welfare check, 9 March 2026.

May 2026
Inspector of the LECC Closes Complaint — Bruce McClintog SC, the Inspector of the LECC, issued a decision on 19 May 2026 closing my complaint (CASE20237645). The OILECC stated there was "no evidence" that the LECC told NSWPF they would block me from their servers — contradicting what Brendan had claimed to Queensland Health. The complaint was closed without engaging the documentary record of the welfare check, the evidence destruction, or the 99-day charging anomaly.
📄

LECC Inspector Decision

Decision closing CASE20237645, 19 May 2026.

The Closed Loop

Critical Pattern

The pattern across every oversight body is the same: my complaint about Kings Cross PAC conduct is referred back to Kings Cross PAC for response. The command authors the briefing about the complaint against it. The oversight body accepts that briefing. The matter is closed. No independent investigation has been conducted at any stage.

Pending