What happened

On 29 November 2024, Joseph De Angeli said using Tony’s name as an online alias did not meet the identity-offence threshold. He said investigators would need proof that identification documents were used to open the accounts and facilitate drug supply. Tony’s earlier email reported a drug-selling account renamed Tony Smith and a Microsoft account using Anthony Smith. Police records contain his earlier financial and account-misuse reports. Cybertrace’s June 2025 report adds findings about drug advertising and a Microsoft account.

Tony says he gave police much more material than he gave Cybertrace. He limited his input to Cybertrace because he wanted the private investigator to assess the material independently.

Tony Smith · explanation supplied for this review · 4 October 2026

Sources

De Angeli email chain · pp. 1, 5–7 · 19–29 November 2024; GIPAA-2025-0943236 · p. 2 · 16 January 2026; EXT2025-7535 · p. 1 · 19 December 2025; Tony’s account · 3–4 October 2026

What Tony reported

In November 2024, Tony told police a Telegram account had changed its name to Tony Smith and was displaying drug prices and transactions. He also reported a Microsoft Teams account using Anthony Smith, linked to an email he identified as Rushton’s.

Tony says Rushton used his name when contacting him before a hearing. A retained Teams screenshot displays this message on 13 November 2024 at 06:48:

Who are you talking to? I’m Anthony Smith

Cybertrace dates the Microsoft account’s creation to 12 November 2024.

Sources

De Angeli email chain · pp. 6–7 · 19 and 24 November 2024; retained Teams screenshot composite · 13 November 2024, 06:48; Cybertrace 2025-4663 · original pp. 20–21 · 3 June 2025; Tony’s identification and pre-hearing account · 3 October 2026

What police said

De Angeli said he reviewed Tony’s emails and attachments. His reply said investigators would need identification documents used to open the accounts:

Essentially investigators would need to prove that your identification documents were used to open these accounts and facilitate the supply of prohibited drugs.

Comparison with the Act

The Act includes a name or address as identification information when it can identify, or purport to identify, a person. “Dealing” includes making, supplying or using that information. The offences also require an intention to commit or help commit an indictable offence. The text does not universally require a passport or licence.

Read the Act · Read the Judicial Commission explanation

Sources

De Angeli email chain · pp. 1 and 5 · 29 November 2024; Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) · ss. 192I–192K · official 26 September 2024 version, Part 4AB; checked against official December 2024–March 2025 version

Police promised a referral. No matching record was found.

I will pass this on to the relevant officers for further consideration.

Tony used GIPA, the NSW process for requesting government records, to ask for documents showing that De Angeli passed on his drug-supply report.

In January 2026, police said searches found no matching referral records and that the requested information was not held.

A separate decision said police held no formal report or file note behind De Angeli’s identity-crime assessment.

In December 2025, Superintendent Jill Walters had declined further investigation, relying on De Angeli’s advice that the offence elements could not be substantiated. She referred Tony’s complaint to a standards inspector. That is separate from referring the drug-supply report to investigators.

Sources

De Angeli email chain · p. 1 · 29 November 2024; GIPAA-2025-0943236 · p. 2, point 3 and decision; p. 8, reproduced promise · 16 January 2026; GIPAA-2025-0909690 · pp. 6–7 · 20 November 2025; EXT2025-7535 · p. 1 · 19 December 2025

What this meant for Tony

Prosecution 1 · Prosecution 2 · Prosecution 3

Sources

Tony’s account · 3–4 October 2026; Cybertrace 2025-4663 · original pp. 51–52 · 3 June 2025

Later requests for review

On 20 August 2025, MP Alex Greenwich sent Cybertrace’s June report to Police Minister Yasmin Catley and asked for a Cybercrime Squad review.

On 16 March 2026, Tony asked for reassessment by an officer experienced in cybercrime or digital identity offences.

Earlier reports and further source detail

Police records contain Tony’s April–May 2022 reports about money transfers, accounts or loans opened in his name, a phone service created using his credit card and an unfamiliar number added to his TPG account. Tony says account details were replaced with Rushton’s.

Tony’s March request reported financial and account interference and witness intimidation. Its PayID attachment lists payment tests and receipt references. The original receipts are retained separately.

Internal review REV-2025-0947041 describes searches of COPS, RMS, the P-drive and email archives for its own scope. Its findings about Instagram metadata and internal communications are separate from the drug-referral decision.

Sources

Alex Greenwich letter AG58708 · single-page supplied image · 20 August 2025; review request EXT2025-7535 · pp. 1–3 · 16 March 2026; COPS E92324688 · pp. 3 and 6 · reports 26 April and 12 May 2022, printout 1 November 2024; Exhibit C · pp. 2–3 and 8 · March 2026; REV-2025-0947041 · pp. 4–5 · 2 December 2025; Tony’s account · 3 October 2026

Source files

The original 11-page email chain is retained privately because it contains contacts and health details. This is a separate short summary.

The revised summary is on this page.
File hashes

Original email chain SHA-256
bfc880096972bb8c8e83e6a19a3d6a9ae1c3b9869b255290292c5fc3a03d5c70

Short summary SHA-256
1b965bf8806055fef9d674fce9c990329938570877d8cc6ce3c5cfe6da451241

Sources

De Angeli email chain · original 11 pages · 29 November 2024 reply