Dear Editor / Journalist,
I invite you to examine a documented case of police accountability failure in New South Wales that raises serious questions about investigative conduct, prosecution decisions, and oversight mechanisms.
Between 2021 and 2025, I reported sustained online impersonation, identity theft, and device intrusion to NSW Police. I say my reports were not investigated as cybercrime. NSW Police prosecuted me three times. The second prosecution ended not guilty. The third was withdrawn and dismissed. The first resulted in two $500 fines for distributing images that were footage of the very intrusion I had reported.
The person I reported (@kandykingX / Issac Rushton) has never been charged by Kings Cross Police Area Command.
Key Facts:
• 99-Day Anomaly: A police iASK communication-record search returned zero results for the alleged week. Police held the nil-result for 99 days before charging me. It was in the brief of evidence as Item 9.
• Three Prosecutions — Mixed Outcomes: Same complainant (@kandykingX), same prosecutor (Nicholas Nicolas), three different Officers in Charge. The first had four recording charges dismissed and two distribution convictions with $500 fines. The second ended not guilty at the same hearing; the third was withdrawn and dismissed.
• Same-Day Welfare Referral: On 25 June 2025, I complained to Federal Cabinet Minister Tanya Plibersek at 3:33 AM. By 10:00 AM that same morning, Kings Cross Police initiated a cross-border welfare check on me in Queensland. The officer's written reason: "the gentleman has made further complaints to a Federal Ministers Office." Released GIPA records do not record the Triple Zero call said to have prompted the referral.
• Evidence Destruction: OIC Constable Dellenty admitted in GIPA Internal Review REV-2025-0858525 that case file information was deleted after the prosecution's dismissal.
• Oversight Failures: The linked decisions record the LECC and Inspector declining further investigation. I say the oversight responses did not address the records I supplied.
Why This Matters
I ask journalists to examine the police decisions and the records behind them.
• Why were my cybercrime reports not investigated while I was prosecuted three times?
• Why did police charge me 99 days after receiving a communication-record search with zero results for the alleged week?
• Why was a cross-border welfare referral initiated on the same day I complained to a Federal Minister?
• Why has every oversight body closed the matter without examining the documentary evidence?
What I Am Asking
The site links court transcripts, police records, government-information releases and the Cybertrace report for inspection.
I am making the following available for your examination:
• Published documentary archive at kandykingxcase.com with source records
• Unredacted originals available to verified journalists on request
• Direct contact for interviews and clarification
• Multiple angles: police accountability, digital rights, identity theft, cross-border jurisdiction issues, oversight reform
Media Contact
Anthony Lawrence Smith
Email: contact@kandykingxcase.com
Website: kandykingxcase.com
Location: Redcliffe, Queensland
Communication: Written preferred (email). Telephone by arrangement.
I invite you to examine the records and contact me.