Dear Editor / Journalist,
I invite you to examine a documented case of police accountability failure in New South Wales that raises serious questions about investigative conduct, prosecution decisions, and oversight mechanisms.
Between 2021 and 2025, I reported sustained online impersonation, identity theft, and device intrusion to NSW Police. The reports were not investigated as cybercrime. Instead, I was prosecuted three times by the same agency. Two prosecutions collapsed in court. The third produced minimum-penalty convictions for distributing images that were footage of the very intrusion I had reported.
The person I reported (@kandykingX / Issac Rushton) has never been charged by Kings Cross Police Area Command.
Key Facts:
• 99-Day Anomaly: Telstra carrier records showed zero calls on the number I was accused of calling from. Police held the nil-result for 99 days before charging me. The disproof was in the brief of evidence (Item 9: Total Result Count: 0).
• Three Failed Prosecutions: Same complainant (@kandykingX), same prosecutor (Nicholas Nicolas), three different Officers in Charge. Each brief contained evidence directly incompatible with the sworn allegations.
• Same-Day Welfare Referral: On 25 June 2025, I complained to Federal Cabinet Minister Tanya Plibersek at 3:33 AM. By 10:00 AM that same morning, Kings Cross Police initiated a cross-border welfare check on me in Queensland. The officer's written reason: "the gentleman has made further complaints to a Federal Ministers Office." GIPA records confirm no Triple Zero call exists.
• Evidence Destruction: OIC Constable Dellenty admitted in GIPA Internal Review REV-2025-0858525 that case file information was deleted after the prosecution's dismissal. Potential breach of State Records Act 1998.
• Oversight Failures: Every tier of NSW oversight (LECC, Inspector of LECC, Minister for Police) closed the matter without engaging the documentary record.
Why This Matters
This case is not about whether I am guilty or innocent of the charges. It is about whether the documented decisions warrant independent scrutiny:
• Why were my cybercrime reports not investigated while I was prosecuted three times?
• Why did police charge me 99 days after receiving documentary proof the alleged call did not occur?
• Why was a cross-border welfare referral initiated on the same day I complained to a Federal Minister?
• Why has every oversight body closed the matter without examining the documentary evidence?
What I Am Asking
I am not asking you to take my word for any of this. I am asking you to examine the documented record. Every claim on the website is sourced to official records obtained under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW), the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld), court transcripts, or third-party forensic reports.
I am making the following available for your examination:
• Complete documentary archive at kandykingxcase.com with 38+ published PDFs
• Unredacted originals available to verified journalists on request
• Direct contact for interviews and clarification
• Multiple angles: police accountability, digital rights, identity theft, cross-border jurisdiction issues, oversight reform
Media Contact
Anthony Lawrence Smith
Email: contact@kandykingxcase.com
Website: kandykingxcase.com
Location: Redcliffe, Queensland
Communication: Written preferred (email). Telephone by arrangement.
I understand the seriousness of these claims and the responsibility that comes with making them public. The documentary record speaks for itself. I invite you to examine it.